K-POP News

ADOR Allegedly Caught Mendacity About NewJeans’ Filming Controversy

On March 30, NewJeans was noticed filming on the streets of Taipei.

NewJeans-1.jpg" media="(max-width: 380px)"/>NewJeans-1.jpg" media="(max-width: 540px)"/>NewJeans 1
NewJeans filming in Taipei | theqoo

Earlier than the sighting, the general public didn’t know concerning the group’s schedule. So naturally, when the images had been posted, they unfold like wildfire. Nonetheless, alleged workers and NewJeans’ followers started to inform netizens to cease posting concerning the schedule, and an issue erupted.

Controversy Erupts After NewJeans Received Noticed Filming On The Streets

Followers even berated a legendary singer and compelled him to delete his submit that solely talked about NewJeans being in Taipei. This added a large quantity of gas to the fireplace and netizens weren’t happy with the workers and followers’ actions.

NewJeans Followers Beneath Fireplace After Berating Legendary Singer For Mentioning The Group In Now-Deleted Put up

Ultimately, NewJeans’ company ADOR issued a press release denying any wrongdoing by the workers on website.

The accusations which can be being unfold on-line usually are not true. We obtained official permission from the Taipei Metropolis Corridor and the police drive to movie. We carried out our filming throughout the scope of the permission that we obtained.

On the time, our workers had an indication asking folks to not take any footage, however there have been folks taking footage throughout the space that we had been asking for no filming. In these instances, our workers politely requested for the images to be deleted, and everybody who was requested cooperated. There have been no instances of loud voices or disrespect on the filming website.


Nonetheless, netizens weren’t happy with the assertion. One in every of them, a passerby who really occurred to return throughout the filming and accused the workers of inappropriate behaviors, even went so far as to get in contact with authorities officers to substantiate whether or not they obtained permission to movie.

NewJeans-1.jpg" media="(max-width: 380px)"/>NewJeans-1.jpg" media="(max-width: 540px)"/>NewJeans 1

I simply obtained a name again from the legislator’s workplace. They requested the Visitors Part of two districts (Wanhua and Songshan), and the responses had been that they actually didn’t obtain any approval for street closure. The legislator’s workplace mainly stated if the press asks, that may be the reply. The corporate in violation might be blacklisted, and it’ll not be straightforward for them to use for street use permits sooner or later.

– Passerby

Different netizens stood by the passerby.

NewJeans-2.jpg" media="(max-width: 380px)"/>NewJeans-2.jpg" media="(max-width: 540px)"/>NewJeans 2

  • “We will’t simply let this go; Taiwan has been accused of creating up rumors.”
  • “ADOR didn’t count on to run right into a passerby with a lot struggle in them.”
  • Hwaiting, OP.”
  • “Because the legislator confirmed there was no street closure approval, legal guidelines have been damaged. Does ADOR wish to problem Taiwan’s public energy?”

What do you assume the reality is?

Related Articles

Back to top button