The person spent 5 months in jail for a criminal offense he didn’t commit.
Korean musical actor Kang Eun Il’s story not too long ago resurfaced and has grow to be a subject of fashionable dialogue on-line. In 2019, Kang spent 5 months behind the bar as a consequence of false sexual assault allegations earlier than lastly proving his innocence.
A latest episode of tvN STORY’s No Approach I’m An Grownup, forensic video evaluation professional Dr. Hwang Min Goo, mentioned the incident that truly passed off in 2018. Dr. Hwang defined that in 2019, he was approached by actor Kang Eun Il’s uncle to assist his nephew, who was then in jail below false sexual assault accusations.
In March 2018, Kang Eun Il was ingesting at a restaurant along with his pals, and two girls have been current at that place. One of many girls, recognized as ‘A,’ claimed that Kang had sexually assaulted her within the girls’s toilet stall. However Kang refuted the claims, saying ‘A’ was the one who grabbed him in entrance of the toilet stall and threatened him for his cash.
Dr. Hwang then defined that he feels reminiscence is an unreliable proof, however movies by no means lie. And it was with the assistance of the surveillance movies that he was in a position to uncover the reality of this case.
I’m not taking anybody’s aspect. Generally you would possibly keep in mind issues otherwise than what’s recorded on footage…As you retain pondering, typically you begin to imagine {that a} sure occasion occurred, although it by no means did. I don’t belief recollections. However movies all the time let you know the reality.
Throughout the first trial of the case, Kang was sentenced to 6 months in jail based mostly on the accuser’s testimony. However fortunately for Kang, your complete incident was recorded by the restaurant’s CCTV digital camera, which Dr. Hwang analyzed carefully to show his innocence.
In line with his clarification, the toilet of that restaurant had just one entrance, with the ladies’s and males’s stalls separated throughout from each other. The sink space is in the midst of the stalls. Although there have been no surveillance cameras inside the toilet, there was one pointed on the toilet entrance, and the doorway door had a vent as properly.
On the video, ‘A’ may very well be seen following Kang into the toilet, and from the vent, it was seen that Kang went to the boys’s stall whereas ‘A’ went to the ladies’s stall. There wasn’t any motion for some time till the door of the ladies’s stall opened, and ‘A’ walked out.
Dr. Hwang defined that if Kang had gone into the ladies’s stall, as claimed by ‘A,’ the video would have caught his toes shifting in direction of it, and the door of the stall ought to have opened. However after ‘A’ stepping into there, there isn’t any one strolling into the identical stall, and the door solely opened once more when ‘A’ walked out. If the doorway door didn’t have vents, Kang would have undoubtedly been incriminated within the case.
Because of Dr. Hwang’s evaluation, Kang was proved harmless and launched from jail. However the incident took an enormous toll on his life as he was expelled from his company and misplaced all his endorsement offers. However since 2020, after being acquitted of the fees, he has been steadily constructing his life again.
With the present bringing again this incident to fashionable consideration, netizens expressed their anger at each the false accusations and the truth that the authorized system failed to guard an harmless.
- “The lady who accused him needs to be sentenced to jail as properly for her false accusation.”
- “As a lady myself, I feel folks like her needs to be given sentences thrice harsher than the one he needed to serve. She ruined his life deliberately. I hope Kang Eun Il-ssi will get monetary compensation out of her.”
- “So what occurred on the preliminary trial? They accepted her testimony with no additional proof and simply stole his life away from him? Despite the fact that he’s out free now, it will observe his picture endlessly. Shouldn’t the choose and the lady endure the identical penalties that he needed to?”
- “He can now sue her for false accusation and don’t settle.”
- “Even with out the CCTV proof… how was he arrested and imprisoned over no proof? What was her proof? Her mouth?”
Share This Submit
